<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: review: critic proof&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ulteriorepicure.com/2008/07/29/review-critic-proof/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ulteriorepicure.com/2008/07/29/review-critic-proof/</link>
	<description>i live and travel to eat</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 13:07:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ulterior epicure</title>
		<link>http://ulteriorepicure.com/2008/07/29/review-critic-proof/#comment-2554</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ulterior epicure]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 02:42:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ulteriorepicure.wordpress.com/?p=971#comment-2554</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Chuck: Wow, you must have liked Tailor a LOT more than I.  Or, maybe I liked graham elliot a LOT more than you. I will agree that the plating and presentations at graham elliot is considerably less &quot;sophisticated&quot; than at Tailor, but I didn&#039;t find them sloppy, and I didn&#039;t think the flavors were muddled - except the tuna carpaccio, which I wrote about in my blog post. 

Regardless, I&#039;m sorry to hear that you had a disappointing visit at graham elliot.  Will I be reading about it on your blog?  If not, I&#039;d like to know what you ordered.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chuck: Wow, you must have liked Tailor a LOT more than I.  Or, maybe I liked graham elliot a LOT more than you. I will agree that the plating and presentations at graham elliot is considerably less &#8220;sophisticated&#8221; than at Tailor, but I didn&#8217;t find them sloppy, and I didn&#8217;t think the flavors were muddled &#8211; except the tuna carpaccio, which I wrote about in my blog post. </p>
<p>Regardless, I&#8217;m sorry to hear that you had a disappointing visit at graham elliot.  Will I be reading about it on your blog?  If not, I&#8217;d like to know what you ordered.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chuckeats</title>
		<link>http://ulteriorepicure.com/2008/07/29/review-critic-proof/#comment-2553</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chuckeats]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 22:05:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ulteriorepicure.wordpress.com/?p=971#comment-2553</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I went to Graham Elliott last weekend; unfortunately, the whole affair just seemed sloppy.  Tastes were muddled and compositions were confusing.  To me, it seemed like a 2nd- or 3rd-rate Tailor (NYC).  It could have been a bad night, but this is the sort of food I&#039;d rather pass on.  Blackbird would have been a much better option imo (where I did enjoy a great lunch the following day.)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I went to Graham Elliott last weekend; unfortunately, the whole affair just seemed sloppy.  Tastes were muddled and compositions were confusing.  To me, it seemed like a 2nd- or 3rd-rate Tailor (NYC).  It could have been a bad night, but this is the sort of food I&#8217;d rather pass on.  Blackbird would have been a much better option imo (where I did enjoy a great lunch the following day.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

